header-logo header-logo

Court martial

03 November 2011
Issue: 7488 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R v Rheines [2011] EWCA Crim 2397, [2011] All ER (D) 221 (Oct)

The wording of para 3.6.2 of the Guidance on Sentencing in Court Martial did not restrict the court martial to a consideration only of the facts which constituted the crime itself. The reference to a consideration of “how seriously the court views [the offender’s] conduct” extended to the subsequent conduct of the defendant in connection with the offence. The court was entitled to take the subsequent conduct of the defendant into account, not because the subsequent conduct made the offences themselves worse, but because it bore directly on the issue of whether the defendant had shown himself unfit to hold his rank.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In NLJ this week, Ian Smith, emeritus professor at UEA, explores major developments in employment law from the Supreme Court and appellate courts
Writing in NLJ this week, Kamran Rehman and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Operafund Eco-Invest SICAV plc v Spain, where the Commercial Court held that ICSID and Energy Charter Treaty awards cannot be assigned
back-to-top-scroll