header-logo header-logo

Court of Appeal rules against civil partnership for same-sex couples

21 February 2017
Issue: 7735 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Straight couples cannot enter into civil partnerships…yet, the Court of Appeal has held.

Steinfeld and Keidan v Secretary of State for Education [2017] EWCA Civ 81 concerned an opposite-sex couple’s challenge to the Civil Partnership Act 2004, on the grounds same-sex couples can have a civil partnership but they cannot.

The couple contended that this bar breached their Art 14 right not to be discriminated against, and their Art 8 right to private and family life. They said they wanted the rights and benefits of marriage but had “deep-rooted and genuine ideological objections to marriage based upon what they consider to be its historically patriarchal nature”.

The 2004 Act ended generations of inequality by giving same-sex couples not only the right to have their relationship recognised in the eyes of the law but also to equal rights with those of married couples regarding tax, property, death and other matters. Marriage between same-sex couples became legal in 2013.

Since the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013, the number of new civil partnerships has gone down and the number of civil partnership dissolutions has gone up—many civil partners have converted their partnerships into marriages. Consequently, the government has said it wants to wait to see the impact of gay marriage before phasing out or abolishing civil partnership.

Lady Justice Arden and Lords Justice Beatson and Briggs said there was a potential violation of the couple’s Art 8 and 14 rights, but made a declaration that the government could reconsider her policy “either now or at a later time, as appropriate”.

Nigel Shepherd, chair of Resolution, said: “From a purely legal perspective, it makes little sense to retain civil partnership.

“But, if the option of civil partnerships for same sex couples is to continue to be retained, then civil partnerships must also be available to opposite sex couples in order to avoid discrimination.”

A Private Member's Bill proposing civil partnerships for heterosexual couples is due to have its second reading on 24 March 2017, and has cross-party support.

Lauren Evans, family law solicitor at Kingsley Napley, said: “It is imperative now that MPs take up the cause and don’t hide behind the government's current open-ended ‘wait and see’ policy.”

Issue: 7735 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll