header-logo header-logo

10 June 2010
Issue: 7421 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Corporate excellence

Merit, diversity & transparency to transform boardrooms

FTSE 350 directors will need to be re-elected annually by shareholders under new best practice guidelines issued by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) last week.

Changes to the Combined Code, now rebranded the UK Corporate Governance Code, include a recommendation that boards take gender diversity into account when appointing members. Companies will also have to demonstrate that recruitment to the board is based on merit against objective criteria and encouraged to improve risk management by making the board responsible for determining the extent of risk that the company is willing to take. Additionally, board chairmen will be expected to hold regular development reviews with each director and will need to pencil in external board effectiveness reviews every three years.

Speaking at NLJ’s corporate governance newscast last week, Frances Le Grys, a partner at Hogan Lovells, said the new regime reflected a general move, advocated by Sir David Walker, who is leading the inquiry into the corporate governance of banks and other financial institutions, towards “skilling up” the board and ensuring the tools for better stewardship are in place.

“In effect this means getting the right blend of people on the board, briefing and training them properly and then appraising them rigorously. The voice and confidence of non executive directors in particular should be strengthened by the new regime,” she said.

While the code is not binding, companies are required either to follow it or explain how else they are acting to promote good governance.  Lucy Fergusson, a partner at Linklaters, said during the newscast that the pressure shareholders have shown so far in supporting annual re-election rules out non compliance for the top firms: “It may be quite difficult for companies in the FTSE 350 to justify why they won’t opt for annual re-election. Some companies do this voluntarily already, and they haven’t seemed to have suffered because of it.”

Carol Shutkever, partner at Herbert Smith, who chaired the newscast, commented: “A lot of the changes in the code are just ones of tone and emphasis, but together they do amount to a significant shift in the behaviour expected of boards”.

The code applies to listed companies for financial years beginning on or after 29 June 2010.
 

Issue: 7421 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll