header-logo header-logo

16 May 2016
Issue: 7699 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Corporate crime clampdown

New measures to crack down on fraud and money laundering would “represent a massive shake-up—even bigger than the introduction of the Bribery Act five years ago”, lawyers have said.

Prime Minister David Cameron announced proposals to extend the corporate offence of “failing to prevent” to fraud and money laundering, last week at the Anti-corruption Summit 2016. Failing to prevent bribery and tax evasion is already an offence. 

Barry Vitou, head of global corporate crime at Pinsent Masons, says: “The criminalisation of corporate law continues to snowball—these ‘failure-to-prevent’ clauses represent the most sweeping changes to corporate law in over hundred years and a substantial burden for businesses.

“Reforms to liability will place multinationals and other companies under new pressures—executives will need to show that they had robust policies in place to prevent wrong-doing in the event that an employee is found guilty of misconduct. Ensuring oversight at all levels of an organisation will present a challenge—especially where an organisation operates across several jurisdictions.”

The proposals also include requiring foreign companies owning land and property in the UK to join a public register of beneficial ownership, and creating an international anti-corruption coordination centre to help police and prosecutors work together cross-border.

Issue: 7699 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll