header-logo header-logo

19 June 2024
Issue: 8076 / Categories: Legal News , Coronial law
printer mail-detail

Coronial process ‘alienating’

A landmark report has found bereaved interviewees aren’t always informed about legal representation and many highlight a lack of sensitivity

Under the report’s recommendations, the coronial process would include forums for ‘restorative dialogue between the bereaved and professionals who had some involvement in the death’.

Compiled by researchers from Birkbeck and Bath universities between May 2021 and May 2024, the report, ‘Voicing loss’, examined the role of bereaved people in coroners’ investigations and inquests, and is the largest ever empirical study of lay and professional experiences of the coronial process in England and Wales.

While one bereaved interviewee described the process as ‘dignified’ and ‘transformational’, many others highlighted a lack of sensitivity in how professionals spoke about the deceased and dealt with evidence. The report states: ‘They also spoke of feeling alienated by proceedings which seemed to be oriented around legal professionals rather than their own rights, needs and expectations.

‘Some bereaved people (as well as other witnesses) described being subjected to aggressive or belittling questioning.’

The report recommends that bereaved people be given as much notice and information as possible about dates, attendance of witnesses and legal representatives and whether they will be required to give evidence. It advises that bereaved people be ‘fully informed of their right to receive evidence in advance of the final hearing, and how to obtain it’.

Respondents typically reported that they received limited information about their status and potential role in the process, and that communication with the local coroner service was poor.

One bereaved mother said: ‘We didn’t know we could have [legal representation]. We didn’t know, really, what our rights were, what we could have. Nobody told us.’

A bereaved sister said they would have gone into the inquest ‘blindly, with no legal support’, if it hadn’t been for the help of the organisation INQUEST.

Issue: 8076 / Categories: Legal News , Coronial law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll