header-logo header-logo

08 October 2025
Issue: 8134 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-detail

Conveyancing proposals aim to speed up sales

Homebuyers could be given an option to sign a binding contract with vendors to protect against the practice of parties pulling out of agreements after months of negotiations, under a proposed overhaul of conveyancing laws

The government said it hopes to halve the number of failed transactions, and to shave about four weeks off the average sale by improving information-sharing, transparency and security.

Housing secretary Steve Reed said: ‘Buying a home should be a dream, not a nightmare.’

Under the government’s ‘Home buying and selling reform’ consultation, published this week, vendors and estate agents would be required to publish upfront information from searches and surveys before listing. This would include leasehold terms, building safety data, flood risk data and planning consents.

More use would be made of digital tools, with the introduction of ID verification, digital property log books and standardised data sharing.

 A code of practice and mandatory qualifications would be introduced for estate agents, and information on estate agents and conveyancers ‘including their track record and expertise’ would be made available.

Stephen Ward, director of strategy, Council for Licensed Conveyancers, said: ‘Property log books are a great tool that have been shown to greatly smooth and speed up the buying and selling process’.

Welcoming the proposals, Law Society vice-president Mark Evans said the conveyancing process could seem ‘slow and complicated.

‘It can also be confusing as to who should be doing what, and there is the risk of duplication of effort’.

Mark Chick, director of the Association of Leasehold Enfranchisement Practitioners, welcomed a proposal to improve the provision of leasehold sales information and protect sellers from unreasonable fees for requesting this information. However, he hoped ‘lessons from the past’ would be learned, referring to Home Improvement Packs—introduced in 2007 and discontinued three years later due to concerns the extra marketing costs deterred vendors.

Issue: 8134 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll