header-logo header-logo

Controlled conditions: court documents in family proceedings

21 April 2021 / David Burrows
Issue: 7929 / Categories: Features , Family , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
46633
David Burrows outlines the extent & limitation of the court’s control of documents
  • Limitation on court’s ability to refuse release of documents.
  • Limiting access to documents: where strictly necessary.
  • Permission to appeal: compelling reasons.

The background to Re R (Children: Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162, [2021] All ER (D) 58 (Feb) (12 February 2021) shows one extreme of the spectrum of the extent to which the family courts can control release of documents and other evidence in family proceedings. It also provides an opportunity to consider the narrow range of the extent to which a court can control evidence generally, and more specifically (in the case of Re R) the control of release of court documents to a party to proceedings. Normally a party to proceedings would expect to have full access to all documents in a case—as would the court or other parties to proceedings. It will only be in exceptional circumstances, that this right to access will be in any

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll