header-logo header-logo

02 August 2017
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Contracts offered inadequate protection from the mob

A law firm was negligent and in breach of trust in the advice it gave hundreds of UK buyers of off-plan holiday apartments, for failing to warn of suspected Mafia involvement. The mafia connection was discovered by the police and all the properties seized.

The Court of Appeal held the firm, Giambrone, liable for more than £5m deposits lost in the venture, in Main & Ors v Giambrone & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 1193.

The apartments were based in two developments in Southern Italy, Jewel of the Sera and El Caribe, both of which have now been abandoned. Jewel of the Sea was seized by the Italian financial police in relation to allegations of a £400m money-laundering operation organised by the Italian Mafia and the IRA.

More than 100 claimants sought recovery of monies lost, amounting to 50% of the purchase price of the property in each case, from Giambrone.

The Court of Appeal backed the High Court decision, holding that the contract was inadequate to protect the interests of the purchasers, and that the firm did not provide enough relevant information, particularly regarding the payment structure of the project and the promoter’s commission. The Court of Appeal held Giambrone liable for the full consequences of their failure to properly advise purchasers of the risks of the purchase.

Penningtons Manches and Edwin Coe, which are acting for the claimants, said Giambrone and their professional indemnity insurers AIG now say there is no insurance money left for the claimants.

The two firms are now pursuing AIG, arguing that each client has a separate entitlement to the minimum £3m indemnity insurance that solicitors are required to hold. David Greene of Edwin Coe said “It’s a great win in a strong court but the solicitor’s insurers, AIG, claim there is no money in the pot for the winning Claimants which means the judgment is just stage one in ensuring proper compensation.”    

Partner David Niven, who is leading the Pennington Manches team, said: ‘We are delighted with this decision. Our clients have been battling to recover substantial sums for nearly ten years. We hope that AIG will provide compensation without any further delay as our clients have suffered enough.’

Issue: 7757 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll