header-logo header-logo

18 January 2007 / Tracey Anderson , Katy-marie Wilson
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Contract revolution

Katy-Marie Wilson and Tracey Anderson
report on major changes to insurance contract law

Plans to review insurance contract law were announced in January 2006 by the English and Scottish Law Commissions (the commissions) and recommendations will be published in 2007.

All insurance contracts are based on the duty of utmost good faith. The applicability of the principle as regards disclosure of material circumstances and the making of material misrepresentations is set out in the Marine Insurance Act 1906. A circumstance is deemed to be ‘material’ if it is one that would affect the judgment of the (re)insurer in assessing the risk even if, ultimately, it would not have a decisive effect on the (re)insurer’s acceptance of the risk or on the amount of premium charged.

The remedy for breach of the duty is avoidance of the contract, irrespective of whether the breach was made innocently, negligently or fraudulently. However, before a (re)insurer can avoid, it must be shown that the non-disclosure/ misrepresentation actually induced the underwriter to accept the contract on the relevant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll