header-logo header-logo

Contract revolution

18 January 2007 / Tracey Anderson , Katy-marie Wilson
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Katy-Marie Wilson and Tracey Anderson
report on major changes to insurance contract law

Plans to review insurance contract law were announced in January 2006 by the English and Scottish Law Commissions (the commissions) and recommendations will be published in 2007.

All insurance contracts are based on the duty of utmost good faith. The applicability of the principle as regards disclosure of material circumstances and the making of material misrepresentations is set out in the Marine Insurance Act 1906. A circumstance is deemed to be ‘material’ if it is one that would affect the judgment of the (re)insurer in assessing the risk even if, ultimately, it would not have a decisive effect on the (re)insurer’s acceptance of the risk or on the amount of premium charged.

The remedy for breach of the duty is avoidance of the contract, irrespective of whether the breach was made innocently, negligently or fraudulently. However, before a (re)insurer can avoid, it must be shown that the non-disclosure/ misrepresentation actually induced the underwriter to accept the contract on the relevant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll