header-logo header-logo

A continuing storm

01 February 2013 / Kathryn Cearns
Issue: 7546 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Will government proposals for shareholder votes on directors’ pay be effective. Kathryn Cearns reports

As the financial crisis segues into a longer term recession and sovereign debt issue, the corporate world continues to suffer an onslaught of criticism over the pay of directors of public companies. What started as specific complaints over bank executive pay has moved into broader attacks on rewards at the top of the wider corporate community. The government has proposed further legislation in this area (through amendments to the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill), to facilitate the engagement of investors with the issue, but what will it achieve? Indeed, there is a question which seems further than ever from being answered: what is the appropriate level of executive pay?

The current situation

Since 2002, UK quoted companies (as defined by the Companies Act 2006, s 385) have been obliged to give an advisory vote to their shareholders on their directors’ remuneration report (DRR). This gives a means for shareholders to express their views on the overall approach to director

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll