header-logo header-logo

04 December 2008 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Features , Public , Landlord&tenant , Environment , Property
printer mail-detail

Contentious carbon?

How will the commitment to carbon reduction affect the landlord and tenant relationship? Malcolm Dowden reports

The extended Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) is likely to begin operation in April 2010. CRC is designed to reduce energy use. It applies to organisations that annually use more than 6,000MWh of electricity through half hourly metering—typically a £500,000 electricity bill, based on 2008 consumption. Companies and organisations aff ected by CRC will need to buy allowances, initially at a fi xed price of £12 per tonne of CO². Once CRC is in full operation, the price of allowances will be determined by auction.

The need to buy carbon allowances is expected to increase energy costs between 7% and 15%. Th ere will be an element of repayment or “recycling” with the best performers (identified in a government published league table) recovering up to 100% of the cost of their allowances. Eventually, the worst performers might recover nothing.

Effect on landlords and tenants
Where a landlord is a CRC entity, its tenants will also be aff ected.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll