header-logo header-logo

Constructive feedback

09 May 2014 / Rupert Butler , Thomas Horton
Issue: 7605 / Categories: Features , Property , Commercial
printer mail-detail
web_bulter

A constructive trust establishes beneficial interests in property, as Rupert Butler & Thomas Horton report

The declaration of a constructive trust presents one of equity’s practical responses to determine proprietary interests where a claimant has acted to his detriment upon a promise as to the ownership of property. The effect is that the legal owner of the property must accept his role as trustee to the extent of the claimant’s beneficial interests. The recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Agarwala v Agarwala [2013] EWCA Civ 1763, [2014] All ER (D) 150 (Feb) fittingly restates the principles of how a constructive trust establishes beneficial interests in property.

Agarwala: the facts

Jaci Agarwala was Sunil Agarwala’s sister-in-law. Due to Sunil’s poor credit rating, he discussed with Jaci the purchase of a property in her name, which was to be converted into bed and breakfast accommodation. In April 2007, the property was purchased in Jaci’s name, who held the legal title, with the mortgage also in her name. It was agreed that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll