header-logo header-logo

Confidential information

09 February 2012
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Coogan v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another; Phillips v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 48, [2012] All ER (D) 12 (Feb)

Technical or commercial information meant confidential information which was technical or commercial in character. In order to be protected in law, and to be characterised as intellectual property, information had to be confidential or had to have the necessary quality of confidence about it. As a matter of ordinary language, “commercial information” meant information which was commercial in character, rather than information which, whatever its nature, might have had a value to someone. While the prevailing current view was that confidential information was not strictly property, it was not inappropriate to include it as an aspect of intellectual property.

Accordingly, unless there was binding authority to the contrary, given the normal meaning of “commercial information”, the draftsman of s 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 had intended that confidential information of a commercial nature would be included within the definition of intellectual property. As a matter of both principle and practice,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll