header-logo header-logo

Compulsory purchase under review

08 January 2025
Issue: 8099 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Compensation
printer mail-detail
The Law Commission is consulting on proposals to simplify, consolidate and modernise the law of compulsory purchase.

Lawyers have until 31 March to respond to its broad-ranging 359-page paper, published last month. Topics include compensation where an order is withdrawn or abandoned, and the repeal of the Lands Clauses Consolidation Act 1845, which standardised acquisition and compensation procedures.

Commissioner Professor Alison Young said the current law ‘is complex and inaccessible’.

The Law Commission aims to ‘draw heavily’ on its reports in 2002 and 2004 on compulsory purchase, in which it made recommendations that were not subsequently implemented.

Issue: 8099 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Compensation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll