header-logo header-logo

Company—Scheme of arrangement—Jurisdiction

13 December 2013
Issue: 7588 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re Magyar Telecom B. V.  [2013] EWHC 3800 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 20 (Dec)

Chancery Division. Richards J, 3 Dec 2013

The Chancery Division has given guidance on the sanctioning of schemes of arrangements involving companies with interests in different jurisdictions.

Daniel Bayfield (instructed by White & Case LLP) for the company.

The proceedings concerned a company incorporated and registered in the Netherlands. It was a member of a group whose principal business was the operation of telecommunication services in Hungary. The parent of the group was Hungarian Telecom LP, a private investment firm incorporated in Guernsey and managed primarily by a company (Mid Europa), which had its headquarters in London and was authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. The principal liabilities of the company arose under an issue of €345m 9.5% notes, due 2016 (the notes), governed by the law of the State of New York and subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of that state in favour of noteholders.
 
A scheme of arrangement was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll