header-logo header-logo

Community spend

02 February 2012
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Should CIL fund the roll-out of superfast broadband?

Local authorities are divided on the use of the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) to fund the roll-out of super-fast broadband, say solicitors Malcolm Dowden and Jen Hawkins in NLJ. Some want to fund broadband, others prefer to leave it up to communications companies.

Dowden and Hawkins argue that, whatever the local authority’s viewpoint, any decision must be based on “robust evidence” to avoid the risk of legal challenge.

A CIL is a financial charge that local authorities can, at their discretion, charge on development as long as any money raised is used to fund local infrastructure. There is no exhaustive definition of "infrastructure" and it can include, for example, sporting facilities, roads or broadband.

Issue: 7499 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll