header-logo header-logo

Community legal service funding—Costs out of community legal service fund—Jurisdiction

28 April 2011
Issue: 7463 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

F and others v Legal Services Commission [2011] EWHC 899 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 95 (Apr)

Queen’s Bench Division, Sharp J, 8 Apr 2011

Whether someone will suffer financial hardship if their costs are not reimbursed by the losing party is a question of fact and degree; there is no absolute standard by which that can be judged

Robert Marven (instructed by Legal & Governance Team, Legal Services Commission) for the LSC. Guy Mansfield QC (instructed by Kingsley Napley LLP (KN)) for the interveners.

The underlying proceedings concerned a claim for ancillary relief, in which it was argued by the applicant, P, that the respondent, R, was the true beneficial owner of a number of properties and shares. A number of family members intervened in the proceedings. The same firm of solicitors (KN) acted for all the interveners, but had a separate retainer from each. The applicant was publicly funded throughout the proceedings. R and the interveners were non-funded parties. In September 2006, KN wrote on behalf

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll