header-logo header-logo

01 March 2018
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Co-ordinated reform needed to tackle domestic abuse

New sentencing guidelines on domestic abuse, while welcome, are ‘playing round the edges of a serious problem’, a prominent family law solicitor has warned.

The Sentencing Council guidelines, published last week and applicable from 24 May, highlight that domestic abuse covers psychological, sexual, financial or emotional abuse as well as violence. They are ground-breaking in that, for the first time, the Council emphasises that abuse can take place via technology, whether through social media or by the abuser fitting a tracking device to the victim’s car.

The Council advises that there is likely to be an increase in sentence severity where domestic abuse is involved.

However, solicitor-advocate and NLJ columnist David Burrows said: ‘These guidelines are part of an ill-coordinated series of reforms that are playing round the edges of a serious problem.

‘The guidelines—welcome as far as they go—stress that abuse is not restricted to physical contact but can take place via a variety of technology. But co-ordinated law reform is essential. It was promised in the Queen’s Speech. That promise was in place of [then Justice Secretary] Truss’s proposal—lost with the June election—to provide help for those cross-examined by their alleged abuser in person.

‘Much remains to be done, including: legal aid which is simpler and fair to both parties; a clear statutory definition of domestic abuse; Truss’s proposal; enforcement and—yes—"appropriate sentences” for those convicted.’

During last week’s Prime Minister’s Questions, PM Theresa May said the Home Secretary will be issuing a consultation before bringing forward the Domestic Violence Bill so that the government ‘can deal with all aspects of this particular issue’.

Issue: 7783 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll