header-logo header-logo

13 June 2014
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Cleaning up the City

Lawyers have warned that regulators may take an “aggressive approach”, following the Chancellor’s proposals for new criminal offences to curb manipulation of the financial markets.

Chancellor George Osborne announced plans this week in his Mansion House speech to tackle rogue traders, extending existing LIBOR legislation to make it a criminal offence to rig the foreign exchange, fixed income and commodities benchmarks.

Richard Burger, regulatory partner at RPC, says: “The number of prosecutions achieved by the regulators with their new powers will be seen as the yardstick of their success.

“This will put them under a huge amount of pressure to achieve results and almost guarantees a highly aggressive approach. The SFO’s director, David Green, has said he expects to be judged by the results of the agency’s prosecutions of those involved in LIBOR and now the same will be true for future foreign exchange manipulation.

“The introduction of new criminal charges will mean that businesses will feel compelled to increase the already substantial investment they make in compliance for foreign exchange and other fixed income trading teams.”

Andy McGregor, RPC banking litigation partner, says: “The banks are already under a huge amount of regulatory pressure in relation to manipulation of the foreign exchange market, but in financial terms the banks face a similar risk as regards civil litigation from pension funds and other fund managers that lost money because of FX manipulation if there are adverse regulatory findings.

“If regulators find that the banks sought to manipulate FX benchmarks it will be much more straightforward for fund managers to demonstrate that they lost money than it was with Libor, so we anticipate a much larger number of high value disputes against the banks.”

The Chancellor announced a 12-month Fair and Effective Markets Review will be led by Bank of England deputy governor for markets and banking, Minouche Shafik, with Martin Wheatley (chief executive officer, FCA) and Charles Roxburgh (director general, Financial Services, HM Treasury) as co-chairs.

Issue: 7611 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll