header-logo header-logo

18 May 2020
Issue: 7887 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Clarke Willmott LLP—Clare Webb

Firm hires family law partner
Clarke Willmott LLP has announced that a new family law specialist has joined the firm as a partner in its Bristol office.


Clare Webb specialises in divorce and advises on all matters arising from a couple’s separation, including complex financial and children issues.

Clare has a particular interest in helping clients with family businesses and properties abroad. She also assists those who wish to protect and preserve their assets prior to entering a marriage or cohabiting relationship.

A qualified collaborative lawyer, Clare is also a committee member of Bath Resolution, a committee member of Bristol Collaborative Pod and a member of Bristol Resolution.

Gareth Schofield, head of the Bristol office family team, said: ‘We are delighted to have Clare on board. Our family team continues to attract significant work and Clare’s expertise will allow us to continue to provide and expand the services we have become known for. Clare’s background as a collaborative lawyer is a great asset and her sensitive and pragmatic approach to clients is welcomed.

‘A high percentage of Clare’s work arises from referrals from past clients who have first-hand experience of her advice, support and professionalism.’

Clare said: ‘A relationship breakdown is one of the most challenging and emotional times in a person’s life. The way in which separation and divorce is dealt with can have a significant impact on not only the individual client but also the children of the family.

‘I want to help my clients resolve their issues in a constructive and conciliatory way. I think it’s important to take into account the long-term hopes and aspirations of the family as a whole, while at the same time, protecting my clients’ interests.

‘I strive to help clients reach out of court settlements where possible. I like to empower clients to make their own decisions and help them find creative solutions that fulfil their needs and those of the family.’

Issue: 7887 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll