header-logo header-logo

22 June 2011
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Clarke unveils Legal Aid Bill

Justice Secretary introduces the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill

Legal aid will continue to be available to victims of psychological as well as physical domestic abuse, and for matters concerning children with special educational needs.

Justice Secretary Ken Clarke announced the concessions in Parliament this week as he introduced the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill.

Clarke said he would retain the £100,000 equity disregard for homeowners, and that he had dropped a proposal to charge £100 where legal aid recipients had more than £1,000 in savings.

As revealed in the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) green paper last November, the bill removes legal aid from most family law matters, education law, housing (except where there is a threat of homelessness), personal injury, clinical negligence, employment, immigration (except for detention cases) and social welfare law.

The Legal Services Commission will be abolished, and its administrative duties passed to the holder of a new civil service role, the director of legal aid casework.

Justice minister Jonathan Djanogly said: “These reforms will ensure that we have a legal aid system which is targeted at those who need it most, in the most serious cases, as well as providing value for money to the taxpayer.”

The Bill also implements Lord Justice Jackson’s proposals on civil litigation costs.

However, legal aid lawyers accused the government of failing to listen to the public’s concerns. Legal aid practitioners group (LAPG) co-chair Jenny Beck said: "We are appalled that the government has not modified its response despite 5,000 responses to the consultation.

“The government has not listened. The proposals unravel the legal aid system. There will be very little access to justice for the poor. Once the organisations that perform this service are gone, they will never be replaced.”

Steve Hynes, director of the Legal Action Group (LAG), said legal advice agencies across the country faced potential closure due to funding cuts, and that both Birmingham and Ealing Borough faced cuts of more than £1m.

He said LAG had been “working behind the scenes” to try to secure a joint review between sector providers and the government on welfare law and alternative means of funding, but the government had not yet agreed. He speculated that Clarke may announce this next week to coincide with the second reading of the Bill.

Issue: 7471 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll