header-logo header-logo

29 July 2010
Issue: 7428 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

CJC funding move

The Civil Justice Council (CJC) has launched revised proposals for regulating third party litigation funding

Its consultation paper, published last week, A Self-Regulatory Code for Third Party Funding, takes account of Jackson LJ’s recommendations, which were included in his review of civil litigation costs.

Jackson LJ recommended a voluntary code for all litigation funders with effective capital adequacy requirements and restrictions on funders’ ability to withdraw support for ongoing litigation.

He recommended revisiting the prospect of statutory regulation when the third party funding market expands, and ensuring that funders be potentially liable for the full amount of adverse costs, subject to the discretion of the judge.

The CJC code has been revised to include these recommendations.
Third party litigation funding is a small but emerging industry—according to the CJC, it has so far been used in no more than a hundred cases in England and Wales.

The CJC says the code and the association will help ensure that “the nascent litigation funding industry develops in a fair and responsible way, affording protection for consumers who wish to contract services in this market to fund their litigation”.

The CJC anticipates that the considerable majority, if not all customers in the funding market are “informed consumers” and will “have ready access to professional legal and financial advice”.

Responses to the six-week consultation are due in by Friday 3 September 2010.
 

Issue: 7428 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll