header-logo header-logo

10 May 2013
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 10 May 2013

Latest in Jacksonland, flexi tenants and the possibility of advance rent protection

JACKCHAT

And for now

New CPR 44.3(8) loves interim costs when the court orders detailed assessment. In Deutsche Bank v Khan and others [2013] EWHC 1020 (Comm), [2013] All ER (D) 205 (Apr) before Hamblin J the claimant receiving party asked for £2,743,000 which represented two thirds of what it was claiming discounted by 20%. The judge made an interim order for £2,100,000. Cool. The basis of assessment was ordered to be indemnity, the claimant relying on a facility agreement requiring an indemnity for “all costs”. It was held that this was equivalent to indemnity costs and that the clear weight of authority supported the proposition that such a provision meant the indemnity basis. The only authority to the contrary was Re Adelphi Hotel (Brighton) Ltd [1953] 1 WLR 8955 but Vaisey J there had not been followed in other cases.

Mediation conundrum

Mediation may be viewed as a little less attractive if it fails and the ultimate victor

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll