header-logo header-logo

A civil report in the dock

12 August 2016 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7711 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail
istock_90098517_large

Chris Pamplin looks at the issues that can arise when a report written in contemplation of civil proceedings gets drawn into criminal proceedings

Is an expert witness obliged to hand over to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) a report he had prepared for use in earlier civil proceedings? This was the question raised by an expert witness listed in the UK Register of Expert Witnesses recently. This article not only touches on the status of the report itself, but also on issues about the direct application of the contents of the civil report to the matters at issue in any criminal proceedings, and whether the expert was entitled to qualify some of the points contained in the original report.

Who owns the report?

It is usual for an expert report to belong to the party who paid for it, a position controlled by the expert’s contract. In the majority of cases this will be the original instructing solicitor, or his client. But, regardless of who holds the copyright, the report’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll