header-logo header-logo

Civil litigation

18 January 2008
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Crane v Canons Leisure Centre [2007] EWCA Civ 1352, [2007] All ER (D) 281 (Dec)

The distinction between “base costs” and “disbursements” in a collective conditional fee agreement is between:

(i) charges by the solicitors for work which they themselves do or for which they are directly responsible; and

(ii) expenses which they incur for the client, some of which are for other people’s work for which they are not directly responsible and which they simply pass on to the client at cost.

If solicitors properly choose to delegate their own work, they remain entitled to charge on their own account and the proper amount of the charge is not necessarily the same as the amount which they pay to their subcontractor (per Lord Justice May, at para 14, with whom Lady Justice Hallett agreed).

It followed that the fees of costs consultants who conducted a detailed costs assessment were doing solicitors’ work, for which the solicitors remain liable to their client, and so the fees were properly described as profit costs, not disbursements (and a success

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll