header-logo header-logo

29 August 2023
Issue: 8038 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Technology , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Civil Justice Council reports on pre-action protocols

The Civil Justice Council (CJC) published part one of its final report on pre-action protocols last week.

The CJC pre-action protocols working group, chaired by Professor Andrew Higgins, began work in late 2020. The report discusses the potential for digital pre-action portals to make dispute resolution more accessible and efficient, as well as examining the risks involved.

It recommends compliance be made formally mandatory, except where cases are urgent: for example, where the limitation period is expiring or an urgent injunction is sought. Online pre-action portals ‘should be accessible and workable for both professional court users and litigants in person, and digital assistance or paper-based alternatives must be available for litigants in person who are technologically disadvantaged’.

Special provision is made for vulnerable parties—all online pre-action portals should include a question asking parties about their vulnerability, so that extra support can be provided.

Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls and CJC chair, said: ‘Pre-action protocols are an essential part of the wider pre-action civil justice system.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll