header-logo header-logo

11 October 2007 / Simon Johnson
Issue: 7292 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

Choose your law

Will choice of law agreements become popular under
Rome II? Simon Johnson investigates

The Rome II Regulation 864/2007/EC was published on 20 August 2007 and will come into force in January 2009. It applies to situations involving a conflict of laws in respect of non-contractual obligations in civil and commercial matters. It does not apply to revenue, customs or administrative matters or to the liability of the state for acts and omissions in the exercise of state authority (Art 1(1)).

Article 1(2) lists seven categories of non-contractual obligations excluded from the scope of Rome II: non-contractual obligations arising out of family relationships; matrimonial property regimes; wills and succession; bills of exchange; promissory notes and other negotiable instruments; the law of companies; trusts; nuclear damage; and defamation. It does not apply to evidence and procedure (Art 1(3)).

NON-CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Rome II applies to damage arising as a consequence of tort or delict, unjust enrichment, negotiorum gestio (agency without authority) and culpa in contrahendo (pre-contractual situations). It will apply whether or not the obligations in question

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll