header-logo header-logo

Child’s play (Pt 3)

27 July 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7756 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

David Burrows concludes his series by considering the question of a child’s view & understanding in children proceedings

  • When should a court take account of a mature child’s wishes and feelings?
  • ​What rights to be heard on decision-making and release of confidential information does a child have?
  • When is a child entitled to be treated as of having sufficient understanding to have a view and take part in proceedings?

This series of three articles has considered the part children can play in English family proceedings and children’s rights in UK and European Union law. Finally it looks at the significance in any family proceedings a child’s understanding of the issues material to a court or other decision about them (such as release of confidential information). A ‘child’ for this purpose is in law a person under 18 (Children Act 1989 (CA 1989) s 105).

The term ‘understanding’ is used of children’s views in English law in, for example, Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA [1985] UKHL 7, [1986] 1 AC 112,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll