header-logo header-logo

Child benefit

13 January 2012 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Features , Child law , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Michael Tringham examines the law relating to inheritance by children

A double intestacy has brought the sole beneficiary’s mother—the co-habiting partner of the deceased’s three-year-old son Rory—into the High Court as both claimant and defendant (as her son’s litigation friend). The case started with Rory’s grandfather, who died intestate in 2009. His £500,000 estate passed to his son Kieran (Rory’s father), who died seven months later, also intestate.

While Rory’s mother Ellen “nobly”, said Mr Justice Norris (Wright & Greenstreet v Gater & Wright [2011] EWHC 2881 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 153 (Nov)), made no claim on her late partner’s estate, two consequences of the Administration of Estates Act 1925 (s 47) gave her cause for concern:

  • A potential £89,000 inheritance tax bill.
  • Anxiety should her son receive all the money at his 18th birthday—or if he married or formed a civil partnership before then.

She and her late partner’s brother (Rory’s uncle) sought a variation under which they and a solicitor would hold the estate upon trust for Rory until he was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll