header-logo header-logo

12 April 2016
Issue: 7694 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Changes galore for civil law

An “earth-moving” series of changes to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) came into force on 6 April.

Writing in NLJ this week, District Judge Stephen Gold relates the key changes on costs budgets, and charging and attachment applications.

He advises that the Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2016 (SI 2016/234) on multi-track costs management now “effectively forbid completion of anything but the first page summary of precedent H where the value of the claim as stated on the claim form is less than £50,000 (so don’t certify the value at not exceeding £50,000 unless you suffer from costs managementitis)”.

Costs management is now disapplied in relation to litigants in person where the claimant is a child or where the court otherwise orders.

Gold reports that “there is a new creature on the block—the agreed budget discussion report”. This is to be filed no later than seven days before the first case management conference in the event that precedents H have gone in.

On charging and attachment, all new non-high court applications from 6 April must be made to the County Court Money Claims Centre, and other amendments to the regime also apply. Should the judgment debtor or anyone else served wish to challenge the making of a final charging order then they must file and serve written evidence stating the grounds of objection within 28 days after service of the interim order.

Meanwhile a two year pilot has commenced as from 1 April 2016 for insolvency express trials which will run in the Bankruptcy and Companies Court of the High Court.

Issue: 7694 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll