header-logo header-logo

14 April 2011
Issue: 7461 + 7462 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Chancery Lane hails red tape victory

A campaign to reduce the burden on solicitors of the money laundering regulations has taken a major step forward, according to the Law Society.

The Treasury and Department for Business, Innovation & Skills said last week that it would consult on scrapping criminal penalties for failure to carry out customer due diligence checks. The Law Society hailed the news as a “victory for proportionality”.

Law Society chief executive Des Hudson said: “If the changes are implemented, while firms will still need to conduct due diligence and report suspicions of money laundering, they will no longer need to fear a criminal conviction if a passport they have on file goes out of date or if they did not get the right number of utility bills or bank statements for every director of a company they are instructed by.” 

He added: “We believe this change will help law firms, and others who have to comply with the money laundering rules, to focus more energy on really knowing their client and watching for warning signs of money laundering; rather than being worried they will go to jail if they don’t get the right pieces of paper in every situation irrespective of the risks a client poses.”

Issue: 7461 + 7462 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll