header-logo header-logo

18 October 2007
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Legal News , Banking , Competition
printer mail-detail

Chancellor fails to reassure sceptics

News

A more “certain and protectionist” banking system is needed to minimise the chances of another Northern Rock fiasco, lawyers claim.
The comments follow the government’s decision to increase guaranteed bank saving deposits from £2,000 to £35,000.

Tom Morrison of Rollits Solicitors says it will take more than “calming words” from the chancellor to reassure sceptics.
“While the horse may have bolted somewhat for Northern Rock, there is a need for a more certain and protectionist scheme to be put in place to minimise the chances of a bank run happening on that scale again,” he says. “The scheme needs to be set in stone to communicate with the public in unequivocal terms and must guarantee the savings of the majority using a clear andswift mechanism.”

Meanwhile, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) wants the government to ensure that the fully guaranteed limit remains at £35,000 and to focus on enabling faster payouts from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme in the event of bank failure.

The ABI’s director general, Stephen Haddrill, says the government should not risk distorting the savings market by attempting to protect bank deposits when there are more aspects to consider. He adds that the new limit of £35,000 introduced will protect 98% of savers.

Issue: 7293 / Categories: Legal News , Banking , Competition
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll