header-logo header-logo

09 October 2024
Issue: 8089 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Chambers faced with confusing rules

The chair of the Bar Council has raised concerns about ‘unclear’ changes to the professional rules for barristers

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) issued its seven-page response last week to its October 2023 Consultation on the regulation of barristers in chambers. It proposed an outcomes-based model, which was favoured by larger chambers, but acknowledged smaller sets ‘tended to want the certainty that came with precise rules’.

However, Sam Townend KC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘A move towards outcomes-based regulation is not clear or proportionate for the Bar.

‘Further, we are concerned that the BSB proposals are unclear over who in chambers would hold responsibility for any non-compliance or enforcement activity. Is every member of a set to be held responsible or just those in leadership positions? Heads of chambers who take on these voluntary positions cannot—and should not—be held accountable for the failings of an individual barrister in their chambers.’

There are currently 400 chambers, nearly two-thirds of which have fewer than 50 barristers.

Issue: 8089 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll