header-logo header-logo

Challenging the balance of power

07 March 2019 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 7831 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Judicial review
printer mail-detail

In the first part of a series of three articles, Simon Parsons investigates judicial review of executive action

  • Challenging the power of public bodies.
  • Judicial review as a remedy of last resort.
  • Principles of English public law.
  • Procedural matters.
  • Decisions of public bodies can be challenged by way of judicial review and may be quashed as ultra vires (beyond its powers). Following the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) into domestic law many judicial reviews concern the abuse of Convention rights.

    When determining whether governmental action is legal and valid, the administrative court is exercising what is known as an inherent jurisdiction, ie it derives from the common law and not from statute. The judges are very quick to resist any attempts to curtail this jurisdiction because it gives effect to the underlying values of judicial review that is the rule of law and the separation of powers. The rule of law requires that those who exercise governmental power comply with minimum standards of

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

    Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

    Partner joins family law team inLondon

    Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

    Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

    Private client division announces five new partners

    Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

    Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

    Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

    NEWS
    The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
    Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
    Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
    Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
    Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
    back-to-top-scroll