header-logo header-logo

03 July 2008
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

CFA review announced

Legal news

A government review of no win no fee agreements is unnecessary and will “distract” from ongoing work, say personal injury lawyers.

Justice minister Bridget Prentice announced the review in response to “growing concerns” that conditional fee agreements “may not always be operating in the interests of access to justice”.

The review will examine unmet need, the nature of funding arrangements and their outcome, and quality of service in the legal sector.

Professor Richard Moorhead of Cardiff School of Law, who will carry out the research with two economics professors says: “The controversies generated around no win, no fee agreements cry out for a balanced,evidence-based approach.”

Denise Kitchener, chief executive officer of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers says: “We have had CFAs for 10 years and, while they are not without their problems, claimant lawyers have tried hard to make them work. We are still waiting to hear the government’s response on the claims process consultation, and this additional review could distract time and attention away from work already being undertaken.”
 

Issue: 7328 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll