Claire Sanders warns solicitors to comply with their client retainer or face the consequences
A refusal to continue working for a client until he paid outstanding fees amounted to a repudiatory breach of contract by solicitors the consequence of which was that they were not entitled to recover any of their fees. The stark warning from the High Court in the case of Minkin v Cawdery Fireman & Taylor [2011] EWHC 177, [2011] All ER (D) 82 (Feb) is that solicitors must comply with the provisions in their client retainer letters and that retainer letters must be in clear terms.
Facts
In Minkin the claimant, instructed the appellant solicitors (the firm) to represent him in matrimonial proceedings, in particular at the return hearing of an application by his wife for an occupation order and non-molestation order. The day before the hearing it transpired that the claimant’s wife had left the matrimonial home and rented it to tenants.
The firm advised the client about this and corresponded with the tenants agents. The occupation order was
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=b21f1aaf_1)
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=754d0e82_1)
