header-logo header-logo

Causes for thought

23 October 2014 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail
commentsmith

Roger Smith provides an overview of the latest human rights news

Gray’s Inn proved a curiously appropriate venue for a Brick Court discussion of whether the common law should break free of Europe. The ghost of the great Professor Dicey might have walked through the wood-panelled walls and joined in the debate. Michael Howe QC would certainly have welcomed his intervention in defence of the challenge of human rights to Parliamentary Sovereignty. The rest of the panel might have prayed him in aid—if he had kept up to date—as an analytical lawyer on the question of whether Mr Howe had correctly understood the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.

The participants had been selected more as representatives for various views rather than in the hope of a constructive debate. Dominic Grieve QC MP was, as usual, sensible. Lord Judge persisted with his disingenuous claim that he just wanted clarity on the role of Parliament and the European Court of Human Rights and had no view on what it should be. Isabella

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll