header-logo header-logo

24 May 2007 / Eleanor Furniss
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Carte blanche for hire purchase sharks?

A loophole in statutory protection for customers entering into hire purchase agreements has been exposed, says Eleanor Furniss

The recent case of Black Horse Ltd v Langford [2007] EWHC 907 (QB), [2007] All ER (D) 214 (Apr) has exposed a loophole in the protection offered to consumers entering into hire purchase or other agreements falling within the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA 1974), s 12(a). While it is clear that Black Horse itself was not acting in a manner designed to circumvent CCA 1974, the case has highlighted a means by which other finance companies could do so.

STATUTORY PROTECTION FOR THE CONSUMER

All hire purchase agreements are regulated consumer credit agreements to finance a transaction between the debtor and the creditor, falling within s 12(a).
The person with whom the debtor ordinarily negotiates to enter into a hire purchase agreement is the car dealer. At common law the dealer will not normally be the agent of the creditor (see Branwhite v Worcester Works Finance Ltd [1968] 3 All ER 104), and the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll