header-logo header-logo

Capacity to bring litigation

04 July 2013
Issue: 7567 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Loughlin v Singh and others [2013] EWHC 1641 (QB), [2013] All ER (D) 219 (Jun)

It was an established principle that, to have capacity, the claimant required: (i) the insight and understanding of the fact that he had a problem in respect of which he needed advice; (ii) having identified the problem, it would be necessary for him to seek an appropriate adviser and to instruct him with sufficient clarity to enable him to understand the problem, and to advise him appropriately; and (iii) sufficient mental capacity to understand and to make decisions based upon or otherwise give effect to such advice as he might receive. Further, if the claimant was vulnerable to exploitation or was prone to make rash or irresponsible decisions, he did not necessarily lack capacity. However, the court, in reaching its conclusion, might take such matters into account. In determining capacity, the court had to consider the individual claimant and the particular context, including the fact that the claimant would have control of a substantial fund.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll