header-logo header-logo

Cannabis crackdown

15 May 2008
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Community care , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

News

Cannabis will be reclassified as a class B drug, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith has announced. The drug was degraded to class C in 2004 by the then Home Secretary David Blunkett. The U-turn by the government comes even though cannabis use has, by the government’s admission, fallen significantly across all age ranges in recent years. In making her decision, Smith reportedly went against advice of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD), which wanted to keep cannabis as a class C drug. The council has not been overruled for 30 years. Smith says the reclassification reflects the fact that “skunk”, a much stronger type of the drug, now dominates the market and accounts for 81% of cannabis available on UK streets compared with 30% in 2002.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll