header-logo header-logo

Can more courts, fewer juries make a difference?

28 January 2026
Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Four Nightingale courts are to be made permanent, as justice ministers continue to grapple with the record-level Crown Court backlog

The buildings, in Fleetwood, Telford, Chichester and Cirencester, comprise 11 courtrooms covering criminal, family and civil cases. Their conversion to a permanent status marks the end of the Nightingale initiative, which converted hotels, offices and conference centres into a total of 60 temporary courtrooms during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Law Society president Mark Evans described the move as ‘sensible’, but urged the government to ‘ensure there are enough judges, court staff and lawyers to work on the cases.

‘To bring down the backlogs and ensure truly swift and fair justice, the government must focus on efficiencies and sustained investment across the entire justice system, including reducing the number of cases coming into the courts.’

Ministers have stepped up efforts to bring the backlog of 80,000 cases down, increasing funding for Crown Courts to sit a record 111,250 days this financial year. The Lord Chancellor David Lammy has proposed radical cuts to jury trials, under which slightly less than half of trials currently heard by a jury would instead be heard by magistrates or a judge sitting alone.

Last week, however, the Institute for Government reported that cutting jury trials—a proposal that is widely opposed within the legal profession—would reduce the Crown Court workload by less than 2%. The institute explains one reason for this is juries will continue to be used in the most serious trials, which tend to take the longest to complete.

Hearing more cases in the magistrates’ court, on the other hand, could save 7%-10%—with the caveat that this would depend on a large number of cases being retained in magistrates’ courts, according to the institute’s report, ‘Trial and error? The impact of restricting jury trials on court demand’. 

Issue: 8147 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
The next generation is inheriting more than assets—it is inheriting complexity. Writing in NLJ this week, experts from Penningtons Manches Cooper chart how global mobility, blended families and evolving values are reshaping private wealth advice
back-to-top-scroll