header-logo header-logo

21 October 2014
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Camilla Balleny & Lucy Sewter—Carpmaels & Ransford LLP

Expansion of litigation practice with new life sciences specialist

IP firm Carpmaels & Ransford LLP has expanded its litigation team with the hire of leading life sciences litigator Camilla Balleny from Pinsent Masons. Camilla brings with her Lucy Sewter, a specialist life sciences legal executive. 

Carpmaels advises five of the world’s top 10 originator pharmaceutical companies on their most legally complex and commercially significant cases, including longstanding clients Novartis and Johnson & Johnson. Its Life Sciences Group has more recently added fast growing companies such as Gilead, Shire and Vertex to its roster. Camilla’s appointment comes as part of the firm’s commitment to offering these and other clients a fully integrated IP service at a time of great change in the IP industry.

Camilla Balleny has been a partner at Pinsent Masons for the last four years where she has focused on patent litigation and dispute resolution in the life sciences sector. Lucy has led the IP litigation support team at Pinsent Masons.

Prior to joining Pinsent Masons, Camilla and Lucy worked with Ian Kirby, now head of the dispute resolution team at Carpmaels, at the core of the patent and IP litigation team at Arnold & Porter, where together they acted for clients in litigations before the English IP and Patents Courts, Court of Appeal and in Europe.

Ian says: “It’s fantastic to be working with Camilla and Lucy again. Camilla’s expertise in the life sciences sector enhances our offering and makes her the perfect fit for this firm.

“Carpmaels is already highly regarded for providing its clients with strategic IP advice, and we are confident that our integrated litigation offering will ensure that we continue to lead the market at this time of change.”

Hugh Goodfellow, head of the life sciences group at the firm, adds: “Camilla’s reputation in the life sciences sector is impressive, and we’re thrilled that she has joined the firm. Our life sciences group is a leader in the European market and with our London base, where the life science Unified Patent Court will be located, we will be in the perfect position to offer an unparalleled service to our clients under the new system.

“There is no doubt that the introduction of the Unified Patent Court is a total game-changer for our industry. At Carpmaels we have ensured we are fully prepared for this change and we are on the front foot—ready, with our new litigation partners, to build on our existing reputation as the leading opposition practice before the EPO, by offering a fully integrated service."

Issue: 7627 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll