header-logo header-logo

Call for review of LASPO

21 April 2016
Issue: 7695 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Legal aid solicitors still await government review

As the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) hits its three-year anniversary, legal aid solicitors are still waiting for a review.

LASPO took effect in April 2013, removing legal aid from vast tranches of civil and private family law, including housing (except where an imminent threat of homelessness exists) and social security law.

Writing in NLJ this week, columnist Jon Robins notes the latest figures from the Legal Aid Agency showing the workload for advice and assistance about a legal problem is now one third of pre-LASPO levels and civil representation is about two-thirds of what it was. Despite Ministry of Justice (MoJ) promises, however, there has been no government review of LASPO.

Robins points out that only 226 applications were granted out of 1,172 made to the exceptional funding regime, which was supposed to be a safety net against the LASPO cuts. The MoJ had anticipated that between 5,000 and 7,000 applications would be made each year.

“It’s no surprise as the cuts bite, law firms pull out of what remains of the legal aid scheme, not-for-profit advice agencies go to the wall, and then there is the maddening bureaucracy of legal aid,” Robins writes.

Steve Hynes, director of  the Legal Action Group, says: “The LASPO Act has denied tens of thousands of people access to justice and equality before the law. It should not be reviewed, but repealed.
 
“The MoJ seems to believe that justice is a public service to be rationed, rather than a set of principles to be adhered to.”

An MoJ spokesman said: “As we have already made clear, we are committed to having a review of the legal aid reforms in LASPO. Our legal aid system is still one of the most generous in the world and last year we spent £1.6bn on legal aid. We have made sure legal aid continues to be available in the highest priority cases, for example where people’s life or liberty is at stake, where they face the loss of their home, in domestic violence cases or where their children may be taken into care.”

Issue: 7695 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll