header-logo header-logo

15 September 2016
Issue: 7714 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Call for justice in education

Public funding cutbacks have led to a situation where only two education law providers in England and Wales now have legal aid contracts, a senior education solicitor has warned.

Writing in NLJ this week, John Ford, principal of John Ford Solicitors, expresses regret that successive governments have removed the means of ordinary people to have access to qualified competent lawyers

Ford places much of the blame on the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (LASPO), which he says restricted the scope of civil legal aid: “It is greatly regrettable that, even though the scope of education law to cover children and people under 25 with learning difficulties was officially retained by the changes which could not be resisted, when LASPO was passed, the operation of the publicly funded legal system was consciously modified to remove 95% of the expert providers who could have given advice under legal aid,” he said.

Ford adds that this was achieved, intentionally or not, by “cutting the rates of pay and making costs assessment rules which defeated most meritorious claims”.

Meanwhile, speaking in Parliament this week, Education Secretary Justine Greening presented plans for £50m new funding to expand existing grammar schools, greater selection on academic grounds in state schools and tighter conditions on selective and independent schools.

Issue: 7714 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll