header-logo header-logo

Cab-rank rule future

30 September 2010
Issue: 7435 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Barristers to Assess Future of Cab-Rank RuleThe Bar Standards Board (BSB) is considering whether to reform the cab-rank rule, under which barristers must accept any brief in a field in which they are competent.

Barristers to Assess Future of Cab-Rank RuleThe Bar Standards Board (BSB) is considering whether to reform the cab-rank rule, under which barristers must accept any brief in a field in which they are competent. The discussions, centred around the potential impact on the profession of the new business structures permitted by the Legal Services Act 2007, can be found in the BSB consultation paper, ‘Regulating Entities’, which was launched this week.

Barristers are asked for their views on whether the rule should apply to advocates in the new business structure as well as self-employed barristers, and whether it should apply to all advocates in that entity or only the barristers. The paper considers the scope of the rule and whether it should be limited, and asks whether there is a risk it can be abused.The broad-ranging paper also asks whether restrictions on barristers providing litigation services and holding client money should be lifted.

In August, a YouGov survey found that 35% of barristers would be ‘likely’ or ‘very likely’ to join a new business structure within the next five years if the BSB was to regulate them.

The possible new structures are: Barrister Only Entities (BOEs), businesses with barrister owners and managers alone; Legal Disciplinary Practices (LDPs), businesses with lawyer owners and managers alone; and Alternative Business Structures (ABSs), businesses with both lawyer and non-lawyer owners and managers.BSB chair, Baroness Ruth Deech said there could be “substantial benefits to the public and increased access to justice if we update our regulatory arrangements to reflect the Act”.

Responses are due by 23 December 2010. The consultation is the third in a series to address the implications of the Act. Previous consultations were ‘Legal Services Act 2007–Regulation Implications’, published in January 2008, and ‘Legal Services Act 2007–Legal Disciplinary Practices and Partnerships of Barristers’, published in December 2008.
 

Issue: 7435 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll