header-logo header-logo

06 October 2017
Categories: Legal News , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Business landlords at risk

The traditional assumption that tenants want a longer lease than the landlord wishes to grant has been ‘stood on its head’ by economic uncertainties and Brexit-related relocation concerns.

Writing in NLJ, Rupert Reed QC, Serle Court Chambers, says: ‘After the financial crisis and Brexit, there are real concerns for tenants, including the subsidiaries of international groups unsure of their continued presence in the UK.

‘Some look to consolidate their operations in a smaller number of premises. Average lease lengths are falling, and negative economic expectations mean that leases with shorter terms command higher rentals. It is increasingly the tenant which seeks a shorter lease in referring to the need to maintain flexibility in volatile market conditions.’

Reed says the courts will need to look back to earlier lines of cases in considering the potential hardship to landlords. These are not just higher bills for refurbishment, re-letting and legal costs, but a reduction in capital value off a higher yield, significant accounting losses and in many cases real damage to portfolio performance.

Reed asserts the letting market can no longer rely on old assumptions, and outlines the factors the courts will need in balancing the interests of both parties to the business tenancy (see Under pressure? New business tenancies)

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll