header-logo header-logo

13 December 2023
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bullying, harassment & discrimination at the Bar

Inappropriate or unacceptable behaviour, bullying, harassment and discrimination at the Bar is a ‘systemic issue’, the Bar Council has said, after research uncovered shocking levels of abuse at work

The poor behaviour ranged across the profession and involved judges, barristers, chambers’ staff, solicitors and court staff. Incidents ranged from pejorative or demeaning language to intimidating or bullying behaviour, unwanted attention, unwanted physical contact, sexual harassment and serious abuse, inappropriate comments, online abuse, and sexist, racist and ableist behaviours.

Bar Council research published last week, ‘Bullying, harassment and discrimination at the Bar 2023’, found 44% of respondents have experienced or observed such behaviour while working either in person or online (up from 38% in 2021 and 31% in 2017).

Of the 1,233 barristers who reported experiencing or observing bullying and/or harassment, the majority (53%) reported a member of the judiciary as the person responsible, followed by a more senior barrister (31%) or a barrister at the same level (14%).

Women, people of colour, younger and more junior members of the Bar were most affected by bullying, harassment and discrimination. Barristers with caring responsibilities or a disability also reported being disproportionately affected.

The perpetrators of bad behaviour were generally in a position of power or influence, and included judges, more senior barristers, senior clerks and practice managers. Fear of repercussions was the primary reason given for not reporting incidents. In particular, some people were told that if they complained they would never work at the Bar again.

The data was drawn from the biennial survey, Barristers’ working lives, as well as from reports to Talk to Spot and calls to the Bar’s helplines.

Nick Vineall KC, Chair of the Bar Council, said the Bar Council was committed to addressing the problems and has commissioned a review, to be established by spring 2024 and report back by spring 2025, to identify strategies to curb the abuse.

Sam Townend KC, Chair-Elect of the Bar Council, said: ‘The Bar Council identifies bullying, harassment and discrimination as a systemic issue and we hope the judiciary, clerks, chambers professionals and the Inns will work together with us to facilitate meaningful change.’

Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll