header-logo header-logo

Budget "stealth" tax could see PII payments rise

13 July 2015
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Insurance experts are encouraging law firms to take particular note of the proposed rise in insurance premium tax (IPT) announced in last week’s summer budget.

Nick Paterno, managing partner of McBrides Chartered Accountants, and lead adviser to McBrides legal sector clients says: “Some [law] practices may be forgiven for missing the Chancellor’s ‘stealth tax’ this year in the form of a rise in IPT from 6% to 9.5%. This 58% increase is costly to most businesses but in the legal sector the impact on professional indemnity premiums will be significant.”

For firms renewing insurance this October Legal Risk partner Frank Maher says that it could be worth considering a longer policy period to beat the tax hike. “Eighteen-month policies are generally available, and carry the added bonus of broad cover for a longer period before the dramatic cuts proposed in the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA’s) consultation can take effect.”

The SRA’s discussion paper, "Protecting client’s financial interests", published earlier this month sets out a number of possible options for reforming professional indemnity insurance (PII) arrangements. More detailed proposals will follow in a further consultation in early 2016. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll