header-logo header-logo

13 July 2015
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Budget "stealth" tax could see PII payments rise

Insurance experts are encouraging law firms to take particular note of the proposed rise in insurance premium tax (IPT) announced in last week’s summer budget.

Nick Paterno, managing partner of McBrides Chartered Accountants, and lead adviser to McBrides legal sector clients says: “Some [law] practices may be forgiven for missing the Chancellor’s ‘stealth tax’ this year in the form of a rise in IPT from 6% to 9.5%. This 58% increase is costly to most businesses but in the legal sector the impact on professional indemnity premiums will be significant.”

For firms renewing insurance this October Legal Risk partner Frank Maher says that it could be worth considering a longer policy period to beat the tax hike. “Eighteen-month policies are generally available, and carry the added bonus of broad cover for a longer period before the dramatic cuts proposed in the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA’s) consultation can take effect.”

The SRA’s discussion paper, "Protecting client’s financial interests", published earlier this month sets out a number of possible options for reforming professional indemnity insurance (PII) arrangements. More detailed proposals will follow in a further consultation in early 2016. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll