header-logo header-logo

10 April 2008
Issue: 7316 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Legal services , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

In Brief

News

EASIER EASEMENTS

Wide-ranging reform of the law governing easements, covenants and profits à prendre have been proposed by the Law Commission in a newly published consultation paper. The aim of the project is to modernise and simplify the law, removing anomalies, inconsistencies and unnecessary complications Stuart Bridge, the commissioner leading the project, says recent Land Registry figures suggest at least 65% of freehold titles are subject to one or more easements and 79% are subject to one or more restrictive covenants.

 

CPS SPOTLIGHTED

An inquiry into the work of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has been launched by the Justice Committee. The inquiry will look at how the CPS contributes to, and fits into the criminal justice system, how it relates to and shares information with the police, courts etc and how it works with other prosecution agencies. Its role as regards anti-social behaviour orders will be examined and the duties of the attorney general as superintendent of the prosecution authorities will be an important aspect of the inquiry.

 

TARGET TROUBLES

More children and young people are being brought into the criminal justice system to satisfy police targets, according to a new report by Nacro. The report suggests that offences which would previously have been considered minor and dealt with informally by the police, school or young person’s family, are now being dealt with through formal sanctions. Analysis of crime statistics (comparing 2003 to 2006) reveals disproportionate rises in the number of recorded offences committed by younger children and girls, and a disproportionate rise in less serious offending. Nacro chief executive, Paul Cavadino, says: “For some time we have suspected that the police have been targeting younger children and less serious crimes to reach their targets of ‘offences brought to justice’. Our analysis now shows this is the case.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll