header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7308 / Categories:
printer mail-detail

In Brief

Legal Updates

 

 

REGISTERING LOOPHOLE

 

A lawyer made famous for helping celebrities escape convictions for motoring offences has registered the media coined nickname “Mr Loophole”. Nick Freeman has successfully defended David Beckham, Wayne Rooney and Sir Alex Ferguson (whom he claimed was only driving on the hard shoulder of a motorway because he was suffering from chronic diarrhoea). According to The Times, Freeman has succeeded in registering the name with the UK Patent Office “to ensure that no-one moves into his niche”.
 
KEY 2008 CASES
Free copies of the edited and expanded full text of a lecture given to the Industrial Law Society on key employment and discrimination law cases for 2008 are now available online. The lecture— Key Cases for 2008: A Preview—was given by Michael Rubenstein, editor of the Industrial Relations Law Reports, and contains details of 62 cases yet to be decided. It explores a variety of issues including the validity of non-compete provisions in a deferred share scheme; whether a cost justification defence to discrimination is permissible; and whether there is an obligation on a transfer of undertakings (protection of employment) transferee to consult with employees post-transfer. The complimentary copies of the lecture are available at: www.rubensteinpublishing.com/ Lecture.htm.
 
CJS QUARTERLY RESULTS
The regional performance figures for the criminal justice system (CJS) in the quarter to September 2007 have been published. The statistics show 1.44 million of fences were brought to justice in the 12 months to September 2007, representing an increase of 44% from the year ending March 2002. Performance on public confidence in the CJS was at 43%. It was also shown that the proportion of ineffective trials in the crown court has fallen to 12% from 23.7% in 2002. In magistrates’ courts, the proportion of ineffective trials has fallen to 18.2% from 30.9% in 2002.
Issue: 7308 / Categories:
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll